Vandals or Visionaries Response

  Personally, I think when defining street art, it is up to the eyes of the beholder to determine if it's adding or subtracting from the existing space.  The article brings up the point of street art being "ephemeral." I had to look this word up, but it basically means it lasts for a short time.  This made me think of commissioned wall murals. These murals can be similar to street art in that they both make use of public, typically outdoor, spaces.  The message being sent is up to the artist or commissioner.  The difference is that murals are typically made to last and are "suppose" to be there.  Street art is typically covered up because it's not supposed to be there.  I think that is an important distinction, however,

  But as the world of street art grows, it has become a more respected practice, because it is not always seen as solely destructure, illegal, etc.  I personally do not own property like a car or a house or a building, so based on that, I support street art because I think it is a way for just about anybody to put their artwork on display.  However, I do see how owners of these types of properties would not appreciate their van being tagged.  Overall, I think done with intension and good intent, street art can be a respected art practice.